Well first of all, they have never apologized for the embassy thing back in 1979 and that sticks in the craw of the American people.
Think about this we do not want them to have nukes for whatever reason. We have tried saber rattling, we are trying sanctions but we have NEVER tried talking to them. Direct talks, that is.
Where would talking be less acceptable than blowing them up? A recent poll says that 57% of the American people will support a military action against Iran. That plays well for Bush and the Boyz.
We need, above everything else, some level headed logic in Washington. we have none now and if the election were today, we would have none with a new president. I think all Americans do not want the Iranians to have a bomb, but why would bloodshed be preferable to diplomacy? That is not a sane reaction to the situation.
CHUQ
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A forum for thought and formulation of policy, political, economic and social
1 comment:
The only way we could "for sure" stop them from getting nuclear weapons is if we went to war with them, which will basically be WW3, which the Bush administration seems wholeheartedly set on. Not good. At all.
Post a Comment